The endogenous growth literature includes two competing views concerning the influence of human capital on output growth: human capital may be a conventional input and determine just the level of output or it may be essential to raise productivity via R&D. Distinguishing empirically between these two alternatives is important. This paper shows that the suggestion by Aghion and Howitt (1998) for how to distinguish the two approaches will not work. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 52 (2000) Issue (Month): 4 (October) Pages: 670-76 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:52:y:2000:i:4:p:670-76
Contact details of provider: Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK Fax: 01865 267 985 Email: Web page: http://oep.oupjournals.org/
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)