Marginal and Non-marginal Commodity Tax Reforms with Rank Two and Rank Three Demographic Demand Systems
AbstractThis paper shows that the insensitivity of marginal commodity tax reforms to demand specification does not extend to the nonmarginal case. The size of the tax change has a sharp impact on commodity tax reforms. Unlike price effects, neither household composition nor quadratic Engel curves alters significantly the direction of tax change. The first order approximation overestimates the welfare cost of tax change, and the bias increases sharply with the size of the change. The quality of the approximation also deteriorates with increasing inequality aversion making a Rawlsian less likely than an utilitarian to use the marginal framework. Copyright 1999 by Royal Economic Society.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Oxford Economic Papers.
Volume (Year): 51 (1999)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://oep.oupjournals.org/
Other versions of this item:
- Ray, R, 1997. "Marginal and Non Marginal Commodity Tax Reforms with Rank Two and Rank Three Demographic Demand Systems," Papers, Tasmania - Department of Economics 1997-02, Tasmania - Department of Economics.
- B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
- D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Rinaldo BRAU & Massimo FLORIO, 2004.
"Privatisations as price reforms: Evaluating consumers' welfare changes in the U.K,"
Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, ENSAE,
ENSAE, issue 75-76, pages 109-133.
- R. Brau & M. Florio, 2002. "Privatisations as price reforms: evaluating consumers' welfare changes in the UK," Working Paper CRENoS, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia 200204, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
- Massimo Florio & Rinaldo Brau, 2001. "Privatisations as price reforms: an analysis of consumers' welfare change in the U.K," Departmental Working Papers, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at UniversitÃ degli Studi di Milano 2001-19, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
- Urakawa, Kunio & Oshio, Takashi, 2010. "Comparing marginal commodity tax reforms in Japan and Korea," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 579-592, December.
- Alessandro Santoro, 2007.
"Marginal Commodity Tax Reforms: A Survey,"
Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 827-848, 09.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.