Author
Listed:
- Marios Obwona
- Madina Guloba
Abstract
The period 1990--2000 saw 19 major armed conflicts in Africa. Peace has been elusive, and the term 'post-conflict' often a sad misnomer. War is expensive and hence has powerful economic consequences. Civil war, which is now, by far, the most common form of conflict in Africa, is particularly damaging, reduces incomes, increases capital flight and diverts activity into subsistence livelihood. Post-conflict situations are characterised by unusually wide range of outcomes. While on average economies rebound from war, in some the economies decline and in others they revert to conflict after some time ( Collier et al., 2003 ). Policy choices concerning the economic recovery of these hopeful but fragile situations have received far less attention than issues of humanitarian needs. The current efforts of many African countries coming out of conflicts to develop Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) reflect increased emphasis on mainstreaming poverty reduction through better inter-agency and inter-sectoral co-ordination, and through participatory consultation, consensus building and planning. In addition, it has been widely agreed upon that HIV/AIDS should be prominent in the Poverty Reduction Strategies of poor African countries in light of the challenges that the pandemic poses to poverty reduction efforts. PRSP has become the primary tool in nearly all African countries for articulation of the strategies for growth and poverty reduction. The paper provides the main challenges that the PRSP formulation faces in a post-conflict environment. The key questions discussed in the paper include: Can PRSP work in a post-conflict situation? Are PRSP really relevant at all in such countries? Does a PRSP formulated in a conflict-free country guarantee poverty reduction and overall welfare of the society? Since PRSPs in Africa came at a time when the continent had no choice, are they really home grown as often alleged? How have international donors engaged in the process and what is the way forward? The paper also reviews the historical perspective of conflicts in Africa and points out experiences in some of the conflict-affected African countries as they develop and implement their PRSPs. It concludes that not all African countries in post-conflict recovery have successfully developed their PRSPs. Some are still in the process of doing so and others who have endeavoured to draft one, have not correctly spelled out the donor-specific key objectives of the government's commitment to poverty reduction. Finally, PRSPs often emphasise consumption-related expenditures in mainly social sectors like education and health while ignoring the sectors where the poor are dominant (for example, agriculture). Quite often, the emphasis on such sectors do not lead to significant poverty reduction whether in a post-conflict or conflict-free country. Copyright The author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Marios Obwona & Madina Guloba, 0.
"Poverty Reduction Strategies During Post-conflict Recovery in Africa,"
Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 18(suppl_1), pages -98.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:18:y::i:suppl_1:p:-i98
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:18:y::i:suppl_1:p:-i98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.