IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i2p481-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade flows revisited: further evidence on globalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Arestis
  • Georgios Chortareas
  • Evangelia Desli
  • Theodore Pelagidis

Abstract

We consider the relative effects of globalisation and regionalism in the context of recent developments in the world economy. We extend and advance the work of Chortareas and Pelagidis using the recently updated Penn World Tables data. This allows consideration of the recent 'golden era' of globalisation, great moderation and the 'Washington consensus'. We produce evidence that corroborates the findings of Chortareas and Pelagidis. We find, however, that in the 1990s and in the new millennium globalisation dynamics outpace regionalism. Nevertheless, regionalism displays resilience and in a potential de-globalisation context it is more likely to dominate over globalism. Copyright The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Arestis & Georgios Chortareas & Evangelia Desli & Theodore Pelagidis, 2012. "Trade flows revisited: further evidence on globalisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(2), pages 481-493.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:481-493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ber018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantaras, Konstantinos & Philippas, Dionisis & Siriopoulos, Costas, 2018. "Trade asymmetries in the Mediterranean basin," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 13-20.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:481-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.