The macroeconomic stabilisation effects of Social Security and 401(k) plans
AbstractThis paper investigates how various retirement institutions impact the macroeconomy. We find that for every 1 percentage point increase in the output gap, net flows of various government programmes including Social Security decrease by 0.34 percentage points, while net flows of 401(k) plans increase by 0.05 percentage points. In levels, for every $1 increase in real gross domestic product, net flows from various government programmes shrink by 45 cents, whereas net flows from 401(k) plans increase by 4.6 cents. In other words, 401(k) plans reduce the automatic stabilisation impact of government programmes by 10%--15%. Moreover, we find that Social Security has a net negative effect on household consumption, while 401(k) retirement accounts work the opposite way. In fact the destabilising effect of 401(k) plans on consumption is twice as strong as the one attributed to Social Security.These results highlight a significant problem with 401(k) retirement plans and any retirement plan that is dependent on financial markets. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Volume (Year): 36 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.cje.oupjournals.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.