IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v26y2002i6p727-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on critical realism in political economy

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Nielsen

Abstract

This paper studies critical realism in political economy. The focal points are two important tensions in critical realism. The first tension relates generally to the status and importance of philosophy and the scope of critical realism. The second tension relates specifically to critical realism in political economy. Firstly, two perspectives within critical realism in political economy are separated: a Marxist current and a broad heterodox current. Secondly, these two perspectives within critical realism are contrasted and discussed on the basis of a critical stance towards philosophical reductionism. Thirdly, it is argued that reconciliation between central aspects of the two perspectives is both feasible and desirable, and finally, neo-Marxist political economy is pinpointed as a critical-constructive and developmental mediation for critical realism in political economy. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Nielsen, 2002. "Reflections on critical realism in political economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(6), pages 727-738, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:6:p:727-738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fulvio Castellacci, 2006. "A critical realist interpretation of evolutionary growth theorising," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 30(6), pages 861-880, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:6:p:727-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.