Quality, need, or hunger; begging the question
AbstractWhy do birds and mammals beg and bleat in ways that are energetically wasteful and risk other fitness consequences such as attracting predators? Most workers assume that some genetic conflict is involved, either between parents and offspring or amongst siblings. Mock et al. (2011) provide a thoughtful analysis of the theories available concentrating on those that assume the parent actively chooses which young to feed and that begging and bleating are evolved signals. They argue that the field has concentrated too much on the signal being one of need rather than of quality and discuss a third alternative--signals of hunger. We offer here a few comments in support of Mock et al.'s sensible call for greater debate on alternative mechanisms, though argue that most available evidence supports begging as a signal of need. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by International Society for Behavioral Ecology in its journal Behavioral Ecology.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.