IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1165-1169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic polyethism in leaf-cutting ants

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah J. Waddington
  • Lorenzo A. Santorelli
  • Fiona R. Ryan
  • William O.H. Hughes

Abstract

Females mating with multiple males (polyandry) is taxonomically widespread but is hard to explain in many animals in which it has no obvious direct benefits. In some, of which social insects are the best example, it is suggested that females benefit from the increased genetic diversity of their offspring. Social insect colonies express division of labor, and if genotypes behave differently (genetic polyethism), then genetically diverse colonies may be fitter. However, unequivocal evidence of genetic polyethism is only known from honey bees. Here, we show that such a genetic influence on behavior is also present in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior. In 2 of the 3 colonies examined, we found that the offspring of some fathers (patrilines) were more likely to engage in waste management, whereas other patrilines were more likely to engage in foraging. When we increased the stimulus for waste management, the representation of patrilines in the ants that responded was the same as normally engaged in waste management in 2 colonies but differed in the third colony. The leaf-cutting ant A. echinatior therefore shows genetic polyethism. Although other factors such as disease resistance may have also played a role in the evolution of polyandry, the results suggest that genetic polyethism may be widespread in social insects and potentially of general importance in the evolution of polyandry. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah J. Waddington & Lorenzo A. Santorelli & Fiona R. Ryan & William O.H. Hughes, 2010. "Genetic polyethism in leaf-cutting ants," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1165-1169.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1165-1169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq128
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natasha Constant & Lorenzo A. Santorelli & Juliane F. S. Lopes & William O. H. Hughes, 2012. "The effects of genotype, caste, and age on foraging performance in leaf-cutting ants," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1284-1288.
    2. Pierre-André Eyer & Julien Freyer & Serge Aron, 2013. "Genetic polyethism in the polyandrous desert ant Cataglyphis cursor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 144-151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1165-1169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.