IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i2p396-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing "false" alarm calls by a drongo (Dicrurus paradiseus) in mixed-species bird flocks

Author

Listed:
  • S. Harsha K. Satischandra
  • Prasanna Kodituwakku
  • Sarath W. Kotagama
  • Eben Goodale

Abstract

The suggestion that some members of mixed-species bird flocks use alarm calls when predators are not present in order to startle other species and thereby gain access to additional prey, first postulated by Munn (Munn CA. 1986. Birds that 'cry wolf'. Nature. 391:143--145.), has generated considerable interest due to its implication that the calling birds are intentionally deceiving listeners. Despite this interest, "false alarms" have been studied rarely and without detailed acoustical analysis. We explored whether false alarms are used by Greater Racket-tailed Drongos, which produce a distinctive set of notes when alarmed. We found that drongos did indeed make false alarms, defined as an alarm vocalization made either while the bird was on the perch or in the air, and followed within 10 s by a foraging attempt. However, the acoustic features of the call notes used, particularly of those calls made in the air, were more similar to aggressive calls, made when drongos chased each other, than to actual alarms produced when predators were present. Drongo foraging success was greater after false alarm calls than after silence or nonalarm vocalizations, and playback of false alarms in the air induced escape behavior in other species, though at a lower level than actual alarms. Thus, although drongos can use false alarms to startle other birds and gain foraging opportunities, such calls cannot be called "false" with certainty because they may also signal aggressive intent. Indeed, aggression and alarm may be intertwined in this family of birds as drongos actively mob or chase many predators, including bird-eating hawks. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Harsha K. Satischandra & Prasanna Kodituwakku & Sarath W. Kotagama & Eben Goodale, 2010. "Assessing "false" alarm calls by a drongo (Dicrurus paradiseus) in mixed-species bird flocks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 396-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:396-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:396-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.