IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i6p1315-1322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer S. Hunter

Abstract

Multicomponent aposematic warning signals are generally accepted to function as a deterrent to predatory attacks; however, the relative importance of specific visual cues used by wild predators to recognize defended animals is poorly understood. Here, I use naturally and reciprocally colored taxidermy models of striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) to explore the impact of aposematic coloration and body shape on the behavior of wild mammalian predators. Models were baited, and all visiting species were recorded with remote video cameras at 10 wilderness sites in California, USA. I found that mammalian predators not only approached black-and-white models more hesitantly than gray-colored models but also reacted negatively to skunk-shaped models, suggesting that predators may generalize noxious qualities to both skunk coloration and skunk shape. This study also found an effect of skunk abundance on animal behavior with predators less likely to visit black-and-white models and more hesitant in their approach to skunk-shaped models at sites with greater skunk abundance. These findings suggest that prior experience and the frequency with which aposematic prey are encountered in a landscape are important predictors of predator avoidance of defended prey. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer S. Hunter, 2009. "Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1315-1322.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1315-1322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1315-1322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.