IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i4p691-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parasitic cowbirds may defeat host defense by causing rejecters to misimprint on cowbird eggs

Author

Listed:
  • Bill M. Strausberger
  • Stephen I. Rothstein

Abstract

Experiments suggest that some hosts that reject parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) eggs develop egg recognition by imprinting on their own eggs, probably at the first nest naïve birds attend. This raises the possibility that parasitism of naïve individuals might cause them to mistakenly misimprint on, and accept, cowbird eggs. In an egg-learning experiment designed to cause misimprinting, hosts accepted cowbird eggs when they had laid only 1 egg even though most rejected cowbird eggs when nests had ≥2 host eggs. These findings show that cowbirds can cause misimprinting by parasitizing naïve hosts. If done opportunistically, misimprinting should become more likely as cowbird abundance increases. In accord with this expectation, simulated brood parasitism showed that 3 host species that usually reject cowbird eggs were more tolerant of cowbird eggs in the Great Plains, where cowbirds reach maximal historic abundance, than in eastern North America where cowbirds are less common. This relation between parasite abundance and host responses is opposite to that found in cuckoo hosts. In addition, these 3 rejecter species had high rates (10.8--30.4%) of natural cowbird parasitism at an Illinois site where cowbirds are extremely, and historically, abundant. These rejecters accepted most cases of researcher-detected parasitism, even though they rarely accept where cowbirds are less common. Despite the potentially high cost resulting from egg rejection, we demonstrate that parasitism of "rejecters" can be adaptive for cowbirds particularly when host egg recognition involves learning. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bill M. Strausberger & Stephen I. Rothstein, 2009. "Parasitic cowbirds may defeat host defense by causing rejecters to misimprint on cowbird eggs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 691-699.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:691-699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Liang & Canchao Yang & Anton Antonov & Frode Fossøy & Bård G. Stokke & Arne Moksnes & Eivin Røskaft & Jacqui A. Shykoff & Anders P. Møller & Fugo Takasu, 2012. "Sex roles in egg recognition and egg polymorphism in avian brood parasitism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 397-402.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:691-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.