IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i2p433-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual differences in protandry, sexual selection, and fitness

Author

Listed:
  • Anders P. Møller
  • Javier Balbontín
  • José Javier Cuervo
  • Ignacio G. Hermosell
  • F. de Lope

Abstract

Protandry is the difference in arrival date between males and females, with competition among males for access to preferred territories (the rank advantage hypothesis) or mating success (the mate opportunity hypothesis) supposedly driving the evolution of protandry. The fitness costs and benefits of protandry accruing to individuals differing in degree of protandry (arrival date of a male relative to the arrival date of his partner) have never been quantified. We analyzed the fitness consequences of sex differences in arrival date in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica, in which arrival date can be precisely estimated and the fitness of pairs differing in degree of individual protandry assessed. Early arriving males had greater mating success than late arriving males. The number of extrapair offspring in own nests decreased with increasing degree of individual protandry, whereas the number of offspring fathered by a focal male was unrelated to individual protandry. There was directional selection on individual protandry as shown by pairs with a larger than average degree of protandry reproducing early and, hence, supposedly producing more recruits. There was also stabilizing selection on individual protandry as shown by pairs with an intermediate degree of protandry reproducing early. Annual production of fledglings increased with early arrival of males, but not with early arrival of females, once the effect of laying date had been considered, with no additional effect of individual protandry. Neither male nor female survival was significantly related to degree of individual protandry. These findings are consistent not only with the mate opportunity hypothesis but also with a sexual conflict hypothesis, suggesting that males and females differ in their optimal timing of arrival due to sex-specific fitness costs and benefits. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders P. Møller & Javier Balbontín & José Javier Cuervo & Ignacio G. Hermosell & F. de Lope, 2009. "Individual differences in protandry, sexual selection, and fitness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 433-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:433-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:433-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.