IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1075-1079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male elimination in the honeybee

Author

Listed:
  • Katie E. Wharton
  • Fred C. Dyer
  • Thomas Getty

Abstract

In a striking example of sex allocation modification, female social insect (hymenopteran) workers sometimes cannibalize a fraction of their colony's immature males. The commonly cited explanation for this male elimination is that workers are in genetic conflict with the queen and are biasing the colony's sex allocation in their favor. However, this behavior might allow workers to tailor their colony's investment in reproduction to environmental conditions and therefore might play an important role even in the absence of queen--worker conflict. So far, male elimination has been demonstrated only in species where the potential for queen--worker conflict is high. Here we present experimental evidence for facultative male elimination in the honeybee, a species where queen--worker conflict is expected to be minimal or absent because of multiple mating by the queen. We manipulated the abundance of older male brood in colonies and found that survival of younger male larvae was lower when we increased the abundance than when we decreased it. Survival of worker larvae was high across colony conditions. These results suggest that genetic conflict is not a necessary precondition for male elimination in social insect societies. Instead, male elimination might sometimes reflect adaptive adjustment of male reproductive function, potentially increasing colony efficiency in the interests of all colony members. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie E. Wharton & Fred C. Dyer & Thomas Getty, 2008. "Male elimination in the honeybee," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1075-1079.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1075-1079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1075-1079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.