Female choice for male immunocompetence: when is it worth it?
Abstract
Disease resistance is not determined by any single immune component. Nevertheless, female choice for individual immune components could produce more disease-resistant offspring. Using a mathematical model, we tested whether female choice for male immune responsiveness was maintained or lost in simulated populations. We divided immunity into three different components: two different types of immune responsiveness and the ability to recognize pathogens. Immune responsiveness was divided into constitutive immunity (CI) and inducible immunity (IN) to simulate the fact that mounting an effective immune response requires independently regulated components. By using an immunologically relevant division, empirical data were available to constrain the model parameters. When the pathogen prevalence fluctuated from generation to generation, female choice for IN or CI was usually lost. Female choice for CI was often lost even when choosiness carried no fitness penalty. Choosing for CI or IN produced a fitness advantage over nonchoosers during some generations, but not for others, depending on the identity of the most prevalent pathogens. Choosing for IN or CI led to high mortality when pathogens sensitive to the nonchosen component became prevalent in the population, giving nonchoosers the advantage. Given that most animals experience fluctuating pathogen pressure, our model suggests that there may be little selection for female choice for male CI and/or IN in some species. We discuss the implications of our results for the study of female choice for male disease resistance. Copyright 2005.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by International Society for Behavioral Ecology in its journal Behavioral Ecology.
Volume (Year): 16 (2005)
Issue (Month): 5 (September)
Pages: 871-879
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Email:
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
Order Information:
Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals
Related research
Keywords: ecological immunology; invertebrate; mate choice; sexual selection; specific immunity;References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:5:p:871-879For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.