IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i4p755-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproductive asynchrony and population divergence between two tropical bird populations

Author

Listed:
  • Ignacio T. Moore
  • Frances Bonier
  • John C. Wingfield

Abstract

High-latitude vertebrates generally breed seasonally and synchronously as the primary environmental cue used to time seasonal processes is photoperiod. Investigations of tropical vertebrates have also documented seasonal reproduction, but it is unclear how synchronous reproduction is, both within and between populations. In this study, we investigated whether seasonal reproduction in a tropical species is synchronous between two populations in close proximity and, if not, whether asynchrony is correlated with genetic and cultural differentiation. We describe two equatorial populations of rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis), at the same latitude and separated by 25 km, that each breed seasonally but out of phase with each other. This asynchronous reproductive phenology is associated with local weather patterns and is independent of photoperiod. At a finer scale, reproductive timing is more highly synchronized within monogamous pairs than within the population as a whole. Associated with the difference in reproductive phenologies, we document that males in each population sing different song dialects. Using microsatellite DNA analysis, we found limited gene flow and significant genetic differentiation between the two populations. From these results we hypothesize that cultural and genetic differentiation between populations, which can be greater in tropical populations than temperate ones, can be associated with locally adapted reproductive phenologies. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Ignacio T. Moore & Frances Bonier & John C. Wingfield, 2005. "Reproductive asynchrony and population divergence between two tropical bird populations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(4), pages 755-762, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:755-762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:755-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.