IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p70-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Lindström
  • Christophe Pampoulie

Abstract

Over a broad range of animal systems, male reproductive success depends on resource holding potential (RHP) and resource quality. In a field study, we randomly combined males of different sizes with nests of different sizes to investigate the relative role of resource holding potential and resource quality in determining a sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, male's nest tenure. Individually marked small and large males were given either small or large flowerpots for nests in isolation and were exposed to intruders after they had built nests. We found that nest tenure was longer for big males and owners of big nests. In most cases (34 of 51) the original nest owner was replaced by a bigger male. These replacements by larger males were probably due to takeovers by stronger intruders. Replacement males were larger at big nests. Our results support resource defense theory, as individuals with higher RHP and more valuable resources defended their nest for longer. On nine occasions males abandoned their nests. Owners of these nests were larger than the nest owners that were replaced. Hence, our results may provide an example of a situation in which sand goby males are able to judge the reproductive value of their current situation and act accordingly. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Lindström & Christophe Pampoulie, 2005. "Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 70-74, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:70-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:70-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.