IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p274-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal condition and offspring sex ratio in polygynous ungulates: a case study of bighorn sheep

Author

Listed:
  • Pierrick Blanchard
  • Marco Festa-Bianchet
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
  • Jon T. Jorgenson

Abstract

The Trivers and Willard model (TWM) predicts that for sexually dimorphic polygynous mammals, mothers able to provide a high level of care should bias offspring sex ratio in favor of sons. Contradictory results of empirical studies, however, suggest that selective pressures for adaptive offspring sex ratio vary with species and environmental conditions. We report the results of a 29-year study of marked bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in a population that underwent wide changes in density and where most females were weighed each year. Lamb sex ratio was independent of absolute ewe mass and yearly deviations from individual or population average mass, but there was a nonsignificant trend towards fewer males being born at high population density. Bighorn sheep satisfy all the assumptions of the TWM but not its prediction: lamb sex ratio is independent of maternal ability to provide care. Recent hypotheses to explain the lack of relationship between maternal condition and offspring sex in ungulates are unlikely to apply to bighorn sheep. We suggest that the TWM may only apply when social rank strongly affects the ability to provide maternal care. Those circumstances are likely to occur for only a few species and within a narrow range of environmental conditions. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierrick Blanchard & Marco Festa-Bianchet & Jean-Michel Gaillard & Jon T. Jorgenson, 2005. "Maternal condition and offspring sex ratio in polygynous ungulates: a case study of bighorn sheep," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 274-279, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:274-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:274-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.