IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p742-747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource partitioning between sexes in the "unconventional" hermit crab, Calcinus tubularis

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Gherardi

Abstract

Together with Calcinus verrilli from Bermuda, the Mediterranean hermit crab C. tubularis is unique in that it exhibits a sharp sexual dimorphism in resource use in which one sex, the male, occupies loose shells and the other, the female, occupies attached tubes. Field surveys and laboratory experiments addressed two issues that help understand male-female resource partitioning in this species. First, the value of shells as shelters differs between sexes. Shells furnish mobility to their inhabitants, but also greater opportunities to grow because they can provide larger size than can the tubes, whereas both mobility and large dimensions are crucial selective factors for the reproductive outcomes of males only. In fact, egg production seemed not to be affected by females' sedentary life and the number of eggs was not related to the female size. Second, previous shelter experience plays a role in reducing male-female competition. I found that individual crabs, once presented simultaneously with a shell and a tube, more likely selected the type of shelter that they were collected in. Then, in male-female competition experiments, pairs composed of one crab found in a shell and one crab found in a tube and offered a shell and a tube in conjunction occupied the housing in accordance to the shelter previously occupied without any influence of their sex or size. The question remains as to how, why, and when such a sexual dimorphism in the distribution of C. tubularis between microhabitats did occur during a hermit crab's life. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Gherardi, 2004. "Resource partitioning between sexes in the "unconventional" hermit crab, Calcinus tubularis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 742-747, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:742-747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:742-747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.