IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i6p917-923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of learning foster species' song on the evolution of specialist avian brood parasitism

Author

Listed:
  • J. B. Beltman
  • P. Haccou
  • C. ten Cate

Abstract

Obligate interspecific avian brood parasites do not build nests of their own but lay their eggs in the nests of other species. It has been proposed that a flexible song learning mechanism (copying the heterospecific songs of the foster species) facilitates the evolution of brood-parasitic behavior. Some sort of song copying is common to all songbirds; hence, to better understand the evolution of brood parasitism it is important to study the role of song learning. The proposed hypothesis does not take into account that flexible song learning might make mate acquisition more difficult because males that are preferred by brood-parasitic females would be initially rare. We examine this by means of two population dynamic models. By using a recurrence equation model of brood parasites competing with their nestbuilding ancestors, we show that flexible song learning is indeed an obstacle to the evolution of brood parasitism. Results from a more realistic, individual-based model, in which the brood-parasitic trait can evolve more gradually, confirm this finding. However, we also show that the obstacle of flexible song learning can be overcome quite easily when males also are carriers of the brood-parasitic trait. This is probably because brood parasitism is a neutral trait in males, which increases the number of mutants carrying genes for brood parasitism, and thus makes the female task of finding suitable partners easier. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • J. B. Beltman & P. Haccou & C. ten Cate, 2003. "The impact of learning foster species' song on the evolution of specialist avian brood parasitism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 917-923, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:917-923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:917-923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.