IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v82y2000i4p797-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Genebank Accessions and the Effects of Biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Bonwoo Koo
  • Brian D. Wright

Abstract

The lack of ex ante evaluation of germplasm in genebanks has been the single most prevalent and long-standing complaint of plant breeders about the management of genebanks. Advances in biotechnology offer the possibility of faster, cheaper and more efficient evaluation methodologies. Will these new technologies favor ex post evaluation, as some expect, or will they lead to more ex ante evaluation? Will they also lead to earlier development of varieties with specific traits in anticipation of demand for them? Will the prospect of further advances in biotechnology favor delay of evaluation and development? This paper addresses these questions in the case of evaluation of germplasm for resistance to a disease. Copyright 2000, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonwoo Koo & Brian D. Wright, 2000. "The Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Genebank Accessions and the Effects of Biotechnology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(4), pages 797-811.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:82:y:2000:i:4:p:797-811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/0002-9092.00082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdallah Bari & Hamid Khazaei & Frederick Stoddard & Kenneth Street & Mikko Sillanpää & Yogen Chaubey & Selvadurai Dayanandan & Dag Endresen & Eddy Pauw & Ardeshir Damania, 2016. "In silico evaluation of plant genetic resources to search for traits for adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 667-680, February.
    2. Heisey, Paul & Day-Rubenstein, Kelly, 2015. "Using Crop Genetic Resources To Help Agriculture Adapt to Climate Change: Economics and Policy," Economic Information Bulletin 202351, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kingwell, R. & Godden, D. & Kambuou, R. & Jackson, G., 2001. "Managing and funding germplasm preservation in Papua New Guinea -- for improved indigenous foods," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 265-280, June.
    4. Melinda Smale & Nelissa Jamora, 2020. "Valuing genebanks," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 905-918, October.
    5. Koo, B. & Pardey, P. G. & Wright, B. D., 2003. "The economic costs of conserving genetic resources at the CGIAR centres," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 287-297, December.
    6. Abdallah Bari & Hamid Khazaei & Frederick L. Stoddard & Kenneth Street & Mikko J. Sillanpää & Yogen P. Chaubey & Selvadurai Dayanandan & Dag T. F. Endresen & Eddy Pauw & Ardeshir B. Damania, 2016. "In silico evaluation of plant genetic resources to search for traits for adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 667-680, February.
    7. Mekonnen, Dawit K. & Spielman, David J., 2021. "Changing patterns in genebank acquisitions of crop genetic materials: An analysis of global policy drivers and potential consequences," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Gollin, Douglas & Evenson, Robert, 2003. "Valuing animal genetic resources: lessons from plant genetic resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 353-363, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:82:y:2000:i:4:p:797-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.