IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v81y1999i2p347-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketing Agreement Impacts in an Experimental Market for Fed Cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen R. Koontz

Abstract

Marketing agreements between meatpacking and cattle feeding firms have created concerns about their effects on fed cattle prices. Profit-sharing marketing agreements were imposed onto a simulated fed cattle market. Price level and variability differences with and without agreements, between agreement participants and nonparticipants, during agreement and nonagreement periods, and between participants receiving and not receiving a monetary incentive were evaluated. Prices and variability for nonagreement cattle were higher during the agreement periods. Marketing agreement participants realized lower, less variable prices than nonparticipating firms. Monetary incentives did not affect price levels but increased price variability. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen R. Koontz, 1999. "Marketing Agreement Impacts in an Experimental Market for Fed Cattle," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 347-358.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:81:y:1999:i:2:p:347-358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1244586
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lynn Hunnicutt & DeeVon Bailey & Michelle Crook, 2002. "Measuring Market Power with Variables Other than Price," Working Papers 2002-08, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
    2. John R. Schroeter & Azzeddine Azzam, 2004. "Captive supplies and cash market prices for fed cattle: The role of delivery timing incentives," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 347-362.
    3. Hunnicutt, Lynn & Bailey, DeeVon & Crook, Michelle, 2004. "Rigidity in Packer-Feedlot Relationships," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-12, December.
    4. John R. Schroeter & Azzeddine Azzam, 2003. "Captive supplies and the spot market price of fed cattle: The plant-level relationship," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 489-504.
    5. Brorsen B. Wade & Fain James R. & Maples Joshua G., 2018. "Alternative Policy Responses to Increased Use of Formula Pricing," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Chin, Ming-Chin & Weaver, Robert D., 2002. "Contracting, Captive Supplies, And Price Behavior," 2002 Conference, April 22-23, 2002, St. Louis, Missouri 19052, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    7. Maples, Joshua G. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Peel, Derrell S., 2019. "Technology and evolving supply chains in the beef and pork industries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 346-354.
    8. Chin, Ming-Chin & Weaver, Robert D., 2002. "Contracting, Signaling of Uncertain Quality, and Price Volatility?," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24790, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Lyford, Conrad P. & Hicks, R. Todd & Ward, Clement E. & Trapp, James N. & Peel, Derrell S., 2001. "The Effect Of Contracting On Pricing Dynamics In The Fed Cattle Market: An Experimental Simulation Approach," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20535, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Koontz, Stephen R., 2012. "Impacts of "Right of First Refusal" on Competitiveness of Fed Cattle Markets: Results from an Economic Experiment," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123875, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Weninger, Quinn & Hunnicutt, Lynn, 1999. "Testing for Market Power in Beef Packing: Where Are We and What's Next?," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10575, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Raper, Kellie Curry & Black, J. Roy & Hogberg, Michael & Hilker, James H., 2005. "Assessing Bottlenecks in Vertically Organized Beef Systems," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 36(1), pages 1-5, March.
    13. Kopp, Thomas & Salecker, Jan, 2020. "How traders influence their neighbours: Modelling social evolutionary processes and peer effects in agricultural trade networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Thomas Kopp & Jan Salecker, 2018. "Modelling Social Evolutionary Processes and Peer Effects in Agricultural Trade Networks: the Rubber Value Chain in Indonesia," Papers 1811.11476, arXiv.org.
    15. Bailey, DeeVon, 2000. "Organized Symposium: Price Discovery In Livestock Markets, What Is The Role Of Public Universities," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36475, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Kopp, T. & Salecker, J., 2018. "Identifying Influential Traders by Agent Based Modelling," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277130, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Jared G. Carlberg & Robert J. Hogan & Clement E. Ward, 2009. "Game theory application to Fed Cattle procurement in an experimental market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 56-69.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:81:y:1999:i:2:p:347-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.