IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v78y1996i4p1044-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness of U.S. Food Processing: Benefits from Primary Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Munisamy Gopinath
  • Terry L. Roe
  • Mathew D. Shane

Abstract

High-value agricultural products such as processed foods are becoming increasingly important for both the production and trade of the United States. Efficiency gains in primary agriculture may be transferred to the processed food sector in the form of cheaper inputs because price declines and productivity growth have been coincidental in agriculture. In turn, efficiency gains in the processed food sector are transferred, in part, back to primary agriculture by increasing the derived demand and, thus, mitigating the decline in the latter's price. Efficiency gains are relatively more important in primary agriculture than in food processing. Policies which encourage productivity growth that lowers the production costs can increase the competitiveness of both sectors. The ultimate beneficiaries of the price declines in primary agriculture and food processing are consumers. Copyright 1996, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Munisamy Gopinath & Terry L. Roe & Mathew D. Shane, 1996. "Competitiveness of U.S. Food Processing: Benefits from Primary Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(4), pages 1044-1055.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:78:y:1996:i:4:p:1044-1055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243860
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:78:y:1996:i:4:p:1044-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.