IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v78y1996i2p257-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Public Choice Perspective on Agricultural Policy Reform: Implications of the New Zealand Experience

Author

Listed:
  • F.G. Scrimgeour
  • E.C. Pasour

Abstract

A public choice framework is used to interpret and explore the implications of the dramatic New Zealand economic reforms initiated in 1984. The New Zealand deregulation experience holds lessons for other countries attempting to limit rent seeking and rationalize farm policies. Economic analyses of protectionist policies helped to change public opinion, an important precursor to policy reform. The reform of farm policies was made easier because other sectors were simultaneously restructured. The New Zealand deregulation experience emphasizes the importance of the institutional framework for real world political processes and suggests that constitutional issues warrant more attention in public policy analysis. Copyright 1996, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • F.G. Scrimgeour & E.C. Pasour, 1996. "A Public Choice Perspective on Agricultural Policy Reform: Implications of the New Zealand Experience," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(2), pages 257-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:78:y:1996:i:2:p:257-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243700
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Latruffe, Laure & Dupuy, Aurelia & Desjeux, Yann, 2012. "What would farmers’ strategies be in a no-CAP situation? An illustration to France," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 134989, Agricultural Economics Society.
    2. Harvey, David R., 2003. "Policy Dependency And Reform: Economic Gains Versus Political Pains," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25865, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Harvey, David R., 2004. "Policy dependency and reform: economic gains versus political pains," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 265-275, December.
    4. Rae, Allan N. & Nixon, Chris & Lattimore, Ralph G., 2003. "Adjustment to Agricultural Policy Reform - Issues and Lessons from the New Zealand Experience," Policy Reform and Adjustment Workshop, October 23-25, 2003, Imperial College London, Wye Campus 15741, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    5. Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight & George F. Patrick & Alan E. Baquet, 2002. "Understanding the Economic Factors Influencing Farm Policy Preferences," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 309-321.
    6. Latruffe, Laure & Dupuy, Aurélia & Desjeux, Yann, 2012. "What would farmers’ strategies be in a no-CAP situation? An illustration from France," Working Papers 207987, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    7. Alshyab, Nooh, 2013. "The Political Economy of Reform and Development of the Washington Consensus," MPRA Paper 46014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ronald N. Johnson & Gary D. Libecap, 2003. "Transaction Costs and Coalition Stability under Majority Rule," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 193-207, April.
    9. Henrik Lindberg, 2007. "The Role of Economists in Liberalizing Swedish Agriculture," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 4(2), pages 213-229, May.
    10. Russell L. Lamb, 2002. "A Market-Forces Policy for the New Farm Economy?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 15-30.
    11. Cagatay, Selim & Lattimore, Ralph G., 2001. "Impacts of Trade Liberalization on New Zealand’s Agricultural Supply Response: A Counter Factual Analysis," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125552, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Mark, Tyler B. & Detre, Joshua & D'Antoni, Jeremy & Mishra, Ashok, 2012. "Factors Influencing Farm Operator Expectations on Future Levels of Government Support," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2012, pages 1-17.
    13. Massot Marti, Albert, 2011. "Tribuna de Debate: La PAC 2020: Claves interpretativas de la comunicación de la Comisión Europea, COM (2010) 672 de 18.11.2010," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(01), pages 1-48, November.
    14. Harris, David N. & Rae, Allan N., 2004. "Agricultural Policy Reform and Industry Adjustment in Australia and New Zealand," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15762, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:78:y:1996:i:2:p:257-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.