IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v73y1991i3p703-712..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Costs of Indonesian Sugar Policy: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald C. Nelson
  • Martin Panggabean

Abstract

Indonesian sugar policy is a complex web of contradictory policies, including mandatory production, price supports, and fertilizer and credit subsidies. The policy analysis matrix (PAM) was developed by Monke and Pearson to provide a more complete perspective on social profitability and the divergence between private and social costs than other commonly used social cost-benefit measures. The PAM is used to analyze the effects of Indonesian sugar policy on sugar production in irrigated and dryland areas on Java, the main sugar-producing region in Indonesia, and to identify the distribution of resource transfers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald C. Nelson & Martin Panggabean, 1991. "The Costs of Indonesian Sugar Policy: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 703-712.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:3:p:703-712.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rae, Allan N. & Kasryno, Faisal, 1993. "A Pam Analysis Of Livestock Policies In Indonesia," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Masters, William A. & Winter-Nelson, Alex, 1997. "Evaluating the Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Activities in Developing Countries: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost-Benefit Ration," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198201, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Meliko, Majory O. & Phinea, K. Chauke & Oni, Stephen A., 2010. "The Efficiency of Small-Scale Agriculture in Limpopo Province of South Africa," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 96801, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    4. Baha, Michael & Henningsen, Arne & Elleby, Christian & Mlay, Gilead, 2021. "Competitiveness of Currently Practiced and Alternative Cotton Production Methods in Meatu District, Tanzania," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315901, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Mane-Kapaj, Ana & Kapaj, Ilir & Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine & Totojani, Orkida, 2010. "Assessing the Comparative Advantage of Albanian Olive Oil Production," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Dibrova, Anatolii & Chan-khi, Oksana, 2013. "Policy Analysis Matrix: An analysis of the effectiveness of state agricultural policy for the dairy sector in Ukraine," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 13(28), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Longwe-Ngwira, Abiba & Simtowe, Franklin & Siambi, Moses, 2012. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Groundnut Production in Malawi: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126429, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. dos Santos Alves, Camila Elisa & Belarmino, Luiz Clovis & Padula, Antonio Domingos, 2017. "Feedstock diversification for biodiesel production in Brazil: Using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) to evaluate the impact of the PNPB and the economic competitiveness of alternative oilseeds," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 297-309.
    9. Fazleen, Abdul & Stephan, Von Cramon, 2015. "The Policy Analysis Matrix of Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210872, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Simon Ogoudélé Codjo & Gauthier Biaou & Rose Fiamohe & Florent Kinkingninhoun & Aliou Diagne, 2016. "Microeconomic analysis of the competitiveness of rice production in Benin," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 149-158, November.
    11. Adeoye, I.B. & Oni, O.A., 2014. "Competitiveness and Effects of Policies on Plantain Production Systems in Southwestern Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Winter-Nelson, Alex, 1997. "Rural taxation in Ethiopia, 1981-1989: a policy analysis matrix assessment for net producers and net consumers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 419-431, October.
    13. Adesina, Akinwumi A. & Coulibaly, Ousmane N., 1998. "Policy and competitiveness of agroforestry-based technologies for maize production in Cameroon: An application of policy analysis matrix," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Basavaraj, G. & Rao, Parthasarathy P. & Achoth, Lalith & Reddy, Ravinder Ch., 2013. "Assessing Competitiveness of Sweet Sorghum for Ethanol Production: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(1), June.
    15. Noor P. Khan & Javed Akhtar, 2006. "Competitiveness and Policy Analysis of Potato Production in Different Agro-ecological Zones of Northern Areas: Implications for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 1137-1154.
    16. Muhammad A. Quddus & Usman Mustafa, 2011. "Comparative Advantage of Major Crops Production in Punjab: An Application of Policy Analysis Matrix," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 63-94, Jan-Jun.
    17. Akramov, Kamiljon T. & Malek, Mehrab, 2012. "Analyzing profitability of maize, rice, and soybean production in Ghana: Results of PAM and DEA analysis," GSSP working papers 28, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Fatah, Fazleen Abdul & Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan Von, 2017. "Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia: A Policy Analysis Matrix," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 14(2), December.
    19. Navarro Chavez, Jose Cesar Lenin & Zamora Torres, America Ivonne, 2012. "Performance in the Production of Organic, Biofertilized and Conventional Guava in Zitacuaro´s Region, Michoacan, Mexico," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 1(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:3:p:703-712.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.