IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i1p150-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intangible Assets Through The Cohesion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Roth Anne-Marie-Monika

    (Universitatea de Vest din Timisoara, Facultatea de Economie si Administrare a Afacerilor)

  • Popescu (Stingaciu) Ana-Maria

    (Universitatea de Vest din Timisoara, Facultatea de Economie si Administrare a Afacerilor)

Abstract

INTANGIBLE ASSETS THROUGH THE COHESION POLICY Roth Anne-Marie-Monika West University of Timisoara Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Popescu (Stingaciu) Ana-Maria West University of Timisoara Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Intangible assets in general and intellectual capital in particular are important to both society and organizations. It can be a source of competitive advantage for business and stimulate innovation that leads to wealth generation. Technological revolutions, the rise of the knowledge-based economy and the networked society have all led to the same conclusion that intangibles and how they contribute to value creation have to be appreciated so that the appropriate decisions can be made to protect and enhance them. The Cohesion Policy represents the main EU measure to ensure a balanced and sustainable growth in Europe by promoting harmonious development and reducing the regional disparities. The general objective of the paper is to highlight the important role of the Cohesion Policy in the development of intangible assets. The objectives and the instruments of the Cohesion Policy are designed to support programs on regional development, economic change, enhanced competitiveness and territorial cooperation through the European Union, to develop human resources and employability.

Suggested Citation

  • Roth Anne-Marie-Monika & Popescu (Stingaciu) Ana-Maria, 2012. "Intangible Assets Through The Cohesion Policy," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 150-155, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:150-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n1/021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & John Tomaney, 2008. "Local and Regional Development," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 84(2), pages 241-242, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarkko Saarinen, 2013. "Critical Sustainability: Setting the Limits to Growth and Responsibility in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Eduardo I. Palavicini-Corona, 2012. "Does local economic development really work? Assessing LED across Mexican municipalities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1224, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2012.
    3. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    4. Will Bartlett, 2009. "Economic Development In The European Super-Periphery: Evidence From The Western Balkans," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 54(181), pages 21-44, April – J.
    5. Vasilis Angelis & Katerina Dimaki, 2011. "A Region's Basic Image as a Measure of its Attractiveness," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 4(2), pages 7-33, August.
    6. Giulio Cainelli & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2014. "Spatial agglomeration and firm exit: a spatial dynamic analysis for Italian provinces," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 213-228, June.
    7. Zademach, Hans-Martin & Musch, Annika-Kathrin, 2016. "Sharing is caring? Fahrradverleihsysteme im Kontext nachhaltiger Regionalentwicklung. Entwicklungen, Potenziale, Grenzen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Jacoby, Christian & Wappelhorst, Sandra (ed.), Potenziale neuer Mobilitätsformen und -technologien für eine nachhaltige Raumentwicklung, volume 18, pages 175-204, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    8. Odysseas Moschidis & Vasileios Ismyrlis, 2018. "Citizens' Participation in Local Economic Development and Administration: An Exploratory Statistical Analysis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 16(1), pages 35-54.
    9. Ayda Eraydin, 2014. "The importance of endogenous capacities and government support in the resilience of regions," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1308, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider, 2007. "What Shapes Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes? Evidence from Multicultural European Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-470, June.
    11. Gadille, Martine & MÉhaut, Philippe & courault, Bruno, 2013. "Compétences et régulation des marchés du travail dans les pôles de compétitivité : le cas du pôle Pégase," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2013(02), pages 339-361, June.
    12. Nicoleta Georgeta Panait, 2016. "The Influence of Foreign Direct Investments on Business Environment in Romania," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 86-91, November.
    13. Alejandra Trejo, 2011. "Territorial Competitiveness In A Globalised Economy: The Role Of Transport Costs And Liberalisation," ERSA conference papers ersa10p178, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Martin Ferry, 2013. "Implementing Regional Policy in Poland: A New Era?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1578-1598, October.
    15. Chmieliński, Paweł & Dudek, Michał & Karwat-Woźniak, Bożena & Wrzochalska, Agnieszka, 2011. "The conditions of the development of human capital in agriculture and in rural areas," Multiannual Program Reports 164830, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    16. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider, 2005. "What Shapes the Attitudes Towards Paying Taxes? Evidence from Switzerland, Belgium and Spain," CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-06, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Oliver Klein & Piotr Pachura & Christine Tamasy, 2016. "Globalizing Production Networks," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(2), pages 81-89, June.
    18. Marcin Bogdanski, 2012. "Modern Theories Of Regional Development – A Review Of Some Concepts," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 3(2), pages 25-41, June.
    19. David, Freshwater, 2013. "Modernizing Rural Economies: Strengthening Economic Growth in the 21st Century," Staff Papers 174107, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    20. Roth, Anne-Marie Monika & Popescu (Stingaciu), Ana-Maria, 2012. "The development of intangible assets through the cohesion policy," MPRA Paper 40368, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intangible assets; intellectual capital; Cohesion policy; development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:150-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.