IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oen/econom/y2010i01id227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criteriul Pareto şi cazul principial al “statului creator de bunuri publice”

Author

Listed:
  • Iacob Mihaela, Moşteanu Tatiana

    (Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti)

Abstract

Inside the modern mainstream economic literature of welfare economics there are two main branches, named the “old” and the “new welfare economics”, respectively, but either one having troubles with their foundational premises. The “old” welfare economics tried to turn upside down the laissez-faire conclusions of the Classic School(s), based on the marginalist utility theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Iacob Mihaela, Moşteanu Tatiana, 2010. "Criteriul Pareto şi cazul principial al “statului creator de bunuri publice”," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 01, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oen:econom:y:2010:i:01:id:227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Alexandru Butiseacă, 2010. "The Political Philosophy And The Political Economy Of Public Regulation. An Apropos On The Ultimate Cause Of The Current Crisis," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 5(4-1), pages 23-31, Winter-Sp.
    2. Alexandru Butiseacă & Mihaela Iacob, 2014. "“Trade Liberalization with Chinese Characteristics”: Few Notes on PRC’s WTO Membership," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 17(52), pages 137-156, June.
    3. Octavian-Dragomir JORA & Alexandru BUTISEACA, 2014. "“Free Trade Semantic Disagreements”: Why Wto-Style Multilateral Liberalization And Ftas Stand Much Closer To Protectionism," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 9(2), pages 7-28, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pareto; efficiency; free market; public goods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • H40 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oen:econom:y:2010:i:01:id:227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Octavian Jora (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sorecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.