IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/edukaa/5kmbjh05fxd3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: a quarter century policy audit

Author

Listed:
  • E. Grady Bogue
  • Betty Dandridge Johnson

Abstract

The allocation of funds to public colleges based on performance criteria rather than activity or enrolment criteria is often described as performance funding. In the United States, performance funding policies have become a frequently used instrument of higher education accountability. The history of such policies, however, is a complex one, with some states implementing such policies while others discontinue them. This paper describes and evaluates the first and the longest-standing performance funding policy in the United States, one designed and implemented in 1980 and remaining in effect for over 25 years.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Grady Bogue & Betty Dandridge Johnson, 2010. "Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: a quarter century policy audit," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 22(2), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:edukaa:5kmbjh05fxd3
    DOI: 10.1787/hemp-22-5kmbjh05fxd3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-22-5kmbjh05fxd3
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/hemp-22-5kmbjh05fxd3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veronica Minaya & Judith Scott-Clayton, 2018. "Labor Market Outcomes and Postsecondary Accountability: Are Imperfect Metrics Better Than None?," NBER Chapters, in: Productivity in Higher Education, pages 67-104, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Moore, Richard W & Chapman, Kenneth & Huber, Bettina & Shors, Mark, 2013. "YES, BUT CAN THEY EARN A LIVING? Methods for Creating an Effective System of Measuring Labor Market Outcomes in Higher Education," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt2tf0q5t4, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    3. Xiaodan Hu & Pedro Villarreal, 2019. "Public Tuition on the Rise: Estimating the Effects of Louisiana’s Performance-Based Funding Policy on Institutional Tuition Levels," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(5), pages 636-669, August.
    4. Moore, Richard W & Chapman, Kenneth & Huber, Bettina & Shors, Mark, 2013. "YES, BUT CAN THEY EARN A LIVING? Methods for Creating an Effective System of Measuring Labor Market Outcomes in Higher Education1," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt8dp17626, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    5. Veronica Minaya & Judith Scott-Clayton, 2016. "Labor Market Outcomes and Postsecondary Accountability: Are Imperfect Metrics Better than None?," NBER Working Papers 22880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:edukaa:5kmbjh05fxd3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.