IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v64y2011i4p949-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Would Small Business Owners Fare Under a Business Entity Tax?

Author

Listed:
  • Knittel, Matthew J.
  • Nelson, Susan C.

Abstract

Due to data constraints and the lack of explicit definitions, prior analyses of the impact of the tax code on small business owners were flawed. In this paper, we employ a new data source that allows a much more nuanced definition of small business owner. We present tabulations that quantify various tax characteristics of small business owners for tax year 2007. We then use our results to consider how small business owners might fare under a specific business reform proposal that levies a flat rate on all business income regardless of organizational form.

Suggested Citation

  • Knittel, Matthew J. & Nelson, Susan C., 2011. "How Would Small Business Owners Fare Under a Business Entity Tax?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(4), pages 949-975, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:64:y:2011:i:4:p:949-75
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2011.4.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.4.03
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.4.03
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2011.4.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, Michael G. & Knittel, Matthew J, 2010. "The Implications of Tax Asymmetry for U.S. Corporations," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(1), pages 33-61, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Cooper & John McClelland & James Pearce & Richard Prisinzano & Joseph Sullivan & Danny Yagan & Owen Zidar & Eric Zwick, 2016. "Business in the United States: Who Owns It, and How Much Tax Do They Pay?," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 91-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortmann, Regina & Sureth, Caren, 2014. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 165, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Regina Ortmann & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2016. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(5), pages 441-475, July.
    3. Laura Wegener, 2017. "Strukturelle Unterschiede zwischen positiven und negativen Einkünften – eine Untersuchung der einkommensteuerlichen Verlusteinkunftsarten Gewerbebetrieb sowie Vermietung und Verpachtung auf Basis des ," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 11(3), pages 177-204, December.
    4. Bührle, Anna Theresa & Spengel, Christoph, 2019. "Tax law and the transfer of start-up losses: A European overview and categorization," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-037, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Lei Gao & Leo L. Yang & Joseph H. Zhang, 2016. "Corporate patents, R&D success, and tax avoidance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1063-1096, November.
    6. Guo, Yue Mei & Li, Xiao, 2023. "The impact of greater VAT tax neutrality on total factor productivity: Evidence from China’s VAT credit refund reform in 2018," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 922-936.
    7. Dominika Langenmayr & Rebecca Lester, 2013. "Taxation and corporate risk-taking," Working Papers 1316, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    8. Bührle, Anna Theresa, 2021. "Do tax loss restrictions distort venture capital funding of start-ups?," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-008, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Schmitt, Noemi & Tuinstra, Jan & Westerhoff, Frank, 2017. "Side effects of nonlinear profit taxes in an evolutionary market entry model: Abrupt changes, coexisting attractors and hysteresis problems," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 15-38.
    10. Masanori Orihara, 2016. "Corporate tax asymmetries and R&D: Evidence from a tax reform for business groups in Japan," Discussion papers ron273, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    11. Cronin, Julie Anne & Lin, Emily Y. & Power, Laura & Cooper, Michael, 2013. "Distributing the Corporate Income Tax: Revised U.S. Treasury Methodology," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 66(1), pages 239-262, March.
    12. Rebecca Lester, 2019. "Made in the U.S.A.? A Study of Firm Responses to Domestic Production Incentives," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 1059-1114, September.
    13. Masanori Orihara, 2015. "Tax loss carryforwards and corporate behavior," Discussion papers ron271, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    14. Daniel Dreßler & Michael Overesch, 2013. "Investment impact of tax loss treatment—empirical insights from a panel of multinationals," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(3), pages 513-543, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:64:y:2011:i:4:p:949-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.