Formula Apportionment: Is It Better Than The Current System And Are There Better Alternatives?
AbstractThis analysis of formula apportionment compared to the current U.S. system recognizes that income shifting has two main sources, excess returns attributable to intangibles and debt, and that a major goal of income division systems is preserving neutrality between arm’s length and related party transactions. A model demonstrates that separate accounts (SA) and formula apportionment (FA) distort behavior along different margins. Simulations indicate that FA has no clear advantage over SA. Static estimates of U.S. tax revenues under FA suggest potentially large increases, but simulations show that revenue under FA and SA is similar once behavioral responses are taken into account.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by National Tax Association in its journal National Tax Journal.
Volume (Year): 63 (2010)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
Other versions of this item:
- Rosanne Altshuler & Harry Grubert, 2009. "Formula Apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives?," Working Papers 0901, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- David Wildasin, 2009.
"State Corporation Income Taxation; An Economic Perspective on Nexus,"
2009-08, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.
- Wildasin, David E., 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation: An Economic Perspective On Nexus," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 63(4), pages 903-24, December.
- David E.Wildasin, 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation: An Economic Perspective on Nexus," Working Papers 1011, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
- David E. Wildasin, 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation - An Economic Perspective on Nexus," CESifo Working Paper Series 3218, CESifo Group Munich.
- Harry Grubert & Rosanne Altshuler, 2013. "Fixing the System: An Analysis of Alternative Proposals for the Reform of International Tax," Departmental Working Papers 201305, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
- Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost & Nusser, Hannah, 2013.
"Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform,"
ZEW Discussion Papers
13-044, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
- Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Nusser, Hannah, 2013. "Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-078, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charmaine Wright).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.