IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v57y2004i3p571-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is No Child Left Behind an Un (Or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence From Texas

Author

Listed:
  • Imazeki, Jennifer
  • Reschovsky, Andrew

Abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires states to establish goals for all students and for groups of students characterized by race, ethnicity, poverty, disability, and limited English proficiency, and requires schools to make annual progress in meeting these goals. In a number of states, officials have argued that increased federal education funding is not sufficient to cover the costs imposed by the new legislation. In this paper, we use data from Texas to estimate the additional costs of meeting the new student performance standards. We find that these costs substantially exceed the additional federal funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Imazeki, Jennifer & Reschovsky, Andrew, 2004. "Is No Child Left Behind an Un (Or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence From Texas," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(3), pages 571-588, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:57:y:2004:i:3:p:571-88
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2004.3.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Zhao, 2020. "How to Design a State Education Aid Formula That Is Equitable, Adequate, and Politically Feasible: The Case of Connecticut," Working Papers 21-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. Bo Zhao, 2023. "Estimating the cost function of connecticut public K–12 education: implications for inequity and inadequacy in school spending," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 439-470, July.
    3. Theodore Arapis & Vincent Reitano & Earl Bruck, 2017. "The Fiscal Savings Behavior of Pennsylvania School Districts Through the Great Recession," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 47-70, September.
    4. Buerger, Christian & Bifulco, Robert, 2019. "The effect of charter schools on districts’ student composition, costs, and efficiency: The case of New York state," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 61-72.
    5. Gronberg, Timothy J. & Jansen, Dennis W. & Taylor, Lori L., 2012. "The relative efficiency of charter schools: A cost frontier approach," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 302-317.
    6. Timothy J. Gronberg & Dennis W. Jansen & Lori L. Taylor, 2017. "Are Charters the Best Alternative? A Cost Frontier Analysis of Alternative Education Campuses in Texas," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(3), pages 721-743, January.
    7. Timothy J. Gronberg & Dennis W. Jansen & Mustafa U. Karakaplan & Lori L. Taylor, 2015. "School district consolidation: Market concentration and the scale‐efficiency tradeoff," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(2), pages 580-597, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:57:y:2004:i:3:p:571-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.