IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v57y2004i3p559-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

History and Evaluation of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Author

Listed:
  • Gullo, Theresa

Abstract

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) made two important changes in the way information about the budgetary impact of federal mandates is provided to and used by the Congress: it increased the supply of information about such costs and signaled Congressional willingness to use that information by establishing new points of order procedures for certain bills. Since UMRA’s enactment, the quantity of detailed information provided to the Congress about federal mandates has increased. Furthermore, that information played a prominent role in the Congressional debate over several important intergovernmental issues. By focusing the mandates debate narrowly, however, the act’s long–term usefulness in discouraging the federal imposition of costs on other levels of government may be limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Gullo, Theresa, 2004. "History and Evaluation of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(3), pages 559-570, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:57:y:2004:i:3:p:559-70
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2004.3.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.04
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.04
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ye, Bing & Lin, Ling, 2020. "Environmental regulation and responses of local governments," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:57:y:2004:i:3:p:559-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.