Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Social Insecurity? The Effects of Equity Investments on Social Security Finances

Contents:

Author Info

  • Harris, Amy Rehder
  • Meyerson, Noah
  • Smith, Joel
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    In 2000, the Social Security system experienced an annual net inflow of over $150 billion, raising its balance to over one trillion dollars. Once the baby boom generation begins to retire, however, the annual surpluses will almost certainly turn into deficits, and the trust funds are predicted to be exhausted in 2038. Investing part of the trust funds in equities would increase the expected returns and thus improve the system's expected long-term finances. But with higher expected returns comes higher risk: Equity investment could potentially leave the system worse off. This paper uses the Long-Term Actuarial Model developed by the Congressional Budget Office to analyze both the higher expected returns and the additional uncertainty that accompany equity investment, while recognizing that uncertainty already exists in the system due to unpredictable demographic and economic factors. We find that there is a clear risk-return tradeoff in the short term, but that (given a consistent policy of equity investment) the magnitude of risk falls substantially over a 75-year horizon.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/54/3/ntj-v54n03p645-68-social-insecurity-effects-equity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/54/3/ntj-v54n03p645-68-social-insecurity-effects-equity.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by National Tax Association in its journal National Tax Journal.

    Volume (Year): 54 (2001)
    Issue (Month): n. 3 (September)
    Pages: 645-68

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:54:y:2001:i:n._3:p:645-68

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 725 15th St. NW #600. Washington, D.C. 20005-2109
    Phone: (202)737-3325
    Fax: (202) 737-7308
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ntanet.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. John B. Shoven & Sita N. Slavov, 2006. "Political Risk Versus Market Risk in Social Security," NBER Working Papers 12135, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:54:y:2001:i:n._3:p:645-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charmaine Wright).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.