IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2013-4-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schadet die Flexibilisierung des Arbeitsmarktes der Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Kleinknecht, Alfred
  • Naastepad, C.W.M.
  • Storm, Servaas
  • Vergeer, Robert

Abstract

Deregulation of labour markets and modest wage increases lead to significantly lower rates of labour productivity growth. In this paper theoretical arguments of why ‘rigid’ European labour markets can be useful for innovation are discussed. The arguments are supported by empirical evidence. The argument that high levels of labour turnover are damaging to innovation and learning may be particularly relevant to firms that operate under a Schumpeter II (‘routinized’) innovation model. Such firms are dependent on the historical accumulation of knowledge, much of that knowledge being person-specific and ‘tacit’ (i.e. ill-documented). Longer job durations are therefore favourable to innovation. Garage business enterprises (Schumpeter model I’) – as are found in Silicon Valley, however, instead use generally available knowledge and therefore have less problems with a higher rate of labour turnover. In conclusion, whether a flexible ‘hire & fire’ labour market is damaging to innovation also depends on the dominant innovation model in that sector. Finally, it is interesting to note that typical Anglo-Saxon countries do not seem to differ from typical ‘Rhineland’ countries (‘Old Europe’) in their long-run growth of GDP. It is also questionable whether the more flexible labour markets in Anglo-Saxon countries indeed result in lower unemployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred & Naastepad, C.W.M. & Storm, Servaas & Vergeer, Robert, 2013. "Schadet die Flexibilisierung des Arbeitsmarktes der Innovation?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(4), pages 229-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2013-4-229
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2013-4-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2013-4-229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2013-4-229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2013-4-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.