IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v26y2000i1p15-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relative Efficiency of Fuel Economy Standards Versus Taxes as Environmental Policy Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Steven G. Thorpe

    (University of Northern Iowa)

Abstract

This paper explores the comparative effects of automotive fuel economy standards and taxation on the levels of average fuel efficiency, air quality, and welfare. Theoretical and applied analyses reveal that fuel economy standards can substantially improve average fuel efficiency without having much impact on air quality and welfare, and in contrast, taxation improves air quality and increases welfare without significantly affecting average fuel efficiency. Thus, the results suggest that average fuel efficiency is too indirect a target for reducing automobile-related pollution so that compared to taxation fuel economy standards are a relatively costly means of environmental improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven G. Thorpe, 2000. "The Relative Efficiency of Fuel Economy Standards Versus Taxes as Environmental Policy Instruments," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 15-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:26:y:2000:i:1:p:15-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:26:y:2000:i:1:p:15-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ken Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.