IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-115y2001i1p53-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dopo Chicago, dopo Seattle e il dilemma della globalizzazione

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonor M. Fox

Abstract

Drawing from Giuliano Amato's "Antitrust and the Bounds of Power", Professor Fox poses the dilemma of antitrust and globalization - We may applaud liberalization for tearing down government barriers and increasing economic freedom and opportunity, but we may fear globalization for unleashing private power. To harness the new forces of private power, we may need to do so on a global scale; but if we do so on a global scale we may create unaccountable public power. The controversy surrounding the Chicago School can be seen also in these terms. In the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, Chicago School claimed that we had passed the permissable bounds of public power. But the minimization of US antitrust law unleashed illegitimate private power and produced the post Chicago response. The challenge for the 21st Century is to seek a new equilibrium that has proper regard for both bounds of power.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonor M. Fox, 2001. "Dopo Chicago, dopo Seattle e il dilemma della globalizzazione," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 53-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/115:y:2001:i:1:p:53-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/115
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/115:y:2001:i:1:p:53-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.