Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Tax Controversy or, Should We Forsake Indirect Taxation? A Survey of the Literature

Contents:

Author Info

  • Micheletto Luca

Abstract

We revise the more recent advances in the literature about the so called "direct versus indirect controversy". In particular, we show how the result of "uniform commodity tax under non-linear income taxation" by Atkinson and Stiglitz (1976) has been amended in some contributions that recovers a role for in direct taxation as an instrument of optimal tax policy even in the case where agents' preferences are weakly separable between leisure and other goods.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/12921
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/12921
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica.

Volume (Year): (2004)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 57-88

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/12921:y:2004:i:1:p:57-88

Contact details of provider:

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/12921:y:2004:i:1:p:57-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.