The Quality of Corporate Governance Reporting –Empirical Evidence from Germany
AbstractAccording to the German Corporate Governance Code, a separate corporate governance report should be published in the annual report. In this study a scoring model is developed to evaluate the quality of corporate governance reports published by the 50 largest listed companies in Germany. The assessment criteria were derived from the German Corporate Governance Code and from the recommendations of a national research group. Results show that the reporting on supervisory board, management board and compliance statement is of a relatively good quality. Larger deficiencies can be found regarding the reporting on general meeting, ownership of shares and directors’ dealing, risk management and internal control system and in particular regarding reporting and audit of annual financial statements. Results of univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that the reporting quality is mainly determined by firm size. With regard to the univariate test results, size and a NYSE listing turned out to be significant variables as well.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Advances in Management in its journal Advances In Management.
Volume (Year): 4 (2011)
Issue (Month): 8 (August)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.managein.net/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shankar Gargh).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.