IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v32y2010i3p445-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Keynesians versus Post Keynesians on the theory of prices

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan Melmies

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare New Keynesian and Post Keynesian economics on the theory of prices. In the past two decades, there has been a revival in explanations of price rigidity with the emergence of the "new Keynesian" economists. These economists try to explain the price stickiness that all of the empirical studies on the topic confirm. This paper takes up the question of whether these study findings are compatible with the Post Keynesian theory of prices. On a deeper level, the paper explores the compatibility between the new Keynesian and Post Keynesian theory of prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan Melmies, 2010. "New Keynesians versus Post Keynesians on the theory of prices," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 445-466, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:445-466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=0015RR4176413TM1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tae-Hee Jo, 2013. "Saving Private Business Enterprises," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 447-467, April.
    2. Tae-Hee Jo, 2015. "Financing Investment under Fundamental Uncertainty and Instability: A Heterodox Microeconomic View," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 9(1), pages 33-54, June.
    3. Hamid Raza & Thibault Laurentjoye & Mikael Randrup Byrialsen & Sebastian Valdecantos, 2023. "Resurgence of inflation: Assessing the role of Macroeconomic Policies," Working Papers PKWP2301, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    4. Marc Lavoie & Eckhard Hein, 2015. "Going from a low to a high employment equilibrium," IMK Working Paper 144-2015, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    5. Harry Bloch & Stan Metcalfe, 2018. "Innovation, creative destruction, and price theory," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:445-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.