While methodological sciences have no object and are supposed to adopt a hypothetical-deductive method, substantive sciences, including economics, should use an empirical or historical-deductive method. The great classical economists and Keynes did that and were able to develop open models explaining how equally open economic systems work. Thus, the hard core of relevant economics is formed by the classical microeconomics and the classical theory of capitalist economic growth and by Keynesian macroeconomics. In contrast, neoclassical economists aiming to build a mathematical science wrongly adopted the hypothetical-deductive method and came to macroeconomic and growth models that do not have practical use in policymaking. The exception is Marshall's microeconomics, which does not provide a model of real economic systems but is useful to the analysis of markets.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 31 (2009) Issue (Month): 3 (April) Pages: 493-522 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)