Pamela L. Bachmann Luisa E. Delgado Victor H. Marin
Abstract
Citizen participation has become a commonly used term in political speeches in the last two decades, especially in relation to sustainable development and the environment. Indeed, several documents related to environmental management propose that the best alternative is through all citizens' participation. However, participation may have different meanings for different people. In this context, we analysed its meaning for local decision-makers in the southern Chilean region of Aysen and how it affects their view of local development. We interviewed key informers belonging to public services in charge of the environmental management of the Aysen watershed. Interviews were subsequently analysed through qualitative content-analysis techniques. Our results show that public services understand citizen participation as 'information'; i.e. the public is a passive receptor of information generated by the government. We propose that this understanding of participation does not allow for the integration of social actors, with negative effects on local sustainable development.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.