This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Initial public perceptions of carbon geosequestration: implications for engagement and environmental risk communication strategies

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
E. Miller
J. Summerville
L. Buys
L. Bell
Abstract

Despite active scientific research into the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide, little is known about how the public perceives geosequestration technologies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capturing and storing carbon dioxide in underground sites. Thus, through an online survey (n = 1273), this study investigated Australians' knowledge and perceptions of carbon geosequestration. Most respondents believed that it was important for Australia to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, yet only 18% had previously heard of geosequestration and only 5% closely followed the greenhouse debate. People were keen to participate in public discussions and learn more before forming a definite opinion, although many had 'Not-In-My-Backyard' reactions and raised concerns about the risks and effectiveness of technology and the trustworthiness of organisations. By highlighting current perceptions and knowledge about geosequestration, this research informs environmental risk communication strategies and emphasises the importance of early engagement, education and partnerships between stakeholders for fostering informed decision-making about its use in the Australian context.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://inderscience.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=56554165W26G8V48
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal International Journal of Global Environmental Issues.

Volume (Year): 8 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 147-164
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:mes:ijgenv:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:147-164

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://inderscience.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110856

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: carbon dioxide engagement environmental risk communication strategies carbon geosequestration knowledge public perception risk perception trust greenhouse gas emissions Australia risk communication trustworthiness

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.