Dikes were the core of Dutch river flood protection. Near-floods in 1993 and 1995 and debates about climate change, however, led to a rethinking of existing approaches. In the policy directive 'Room for the River' the focus has shifted from infrastructure (dikes) to spatial measures (bypasses, dike relocations, 'green' rivers). While people and land used to be separated from water by dikes, this new policy intensifies water-society interactions. This has important social, spatial and property consequences for inhabitants, and requires a style of governance based on negotiations between the government and societal actors. In this article, we discuss the case of the Overdiep polder along the river Meuse where a 'Room for the River' project is being implemented. The inhabitants have developed a plan for a spatial redesign of the polder to make peak water retention possible. We discuss key aspects of the complex negotiations about property, security and continuity of living and farming in the polder.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 8 (2009) Issue (Month): 1 (January) Pages: 37-56 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.