Did Proposition 2 1/2 affect local public education in Massachusetts? Using a panel data set on school district budgets (1972â1992), the authors find the following. School districts constrained by Proposition 2 1/2 have significantly less own-source revenue. However, constrained districts receive significantly more intergovernmental revenue approximately offsetting the reduced own-source revenue, leading to no significant change in education spending. On the other hand, an analysis of a cross-section of school districts shows that student achievement in constrained districts is significantly lower than unconstrained districts. Thus, the evidence indicates that Proposition 2 1/2 reduces student performance in Massachusetts, even though it has no significant impact on school resources.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.