On the Gradual-Advance Style of Economic Reform in China
AbstractEconomists have generally recommended [either of] two different types of strategies or styles regarding the reform of a centralized planned economyâa controlled economyâinto a market economy. There are all kinds of descriptive terms that may be applied to these two different categories of reform strategies. One optional strategy is [described as] "radical," "drastic," "Big-Bang," "once-and-for-all," and, sometimes, as "shock treatment." Within this category of reform proposals, however, there are also many dissimilar implications. The more popular style of reform is the one that has been recommended in recent years by Western economists to the countries of Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). [In this type of reform], marketization, privatization, and democratization are the goals chosen as necessary aspects of economic reform. In terms of method, this approach advocates the implementation of an epochal reform strategyânot unlike the notion of God's creationâin which heaven and earth and all manner of things are created within a span of seven days. The other [reform] strategy is comparatively "gradualistic" and "evolutionary." At one time, this latter type of reform was rarely recommended, while the former proposal was very popular and considered to possess theoretical perfection and feasibility.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.
Volume (Year): 28 (1995)
Issue (Month): 6 (November)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.