We previously calculated the profit in issuing notes by national banks to be quite attractive after the late 1890s until all notes were retired in 1935. Yet the banks took until the 1920s to approach the maximum quantity allowed. Proposed explanations in the subsequent literature of this slow response were that redemption costs made note issues unprofitable or that banks had more attractive alternative investments. We show that these explanations are not satisfactory, and that a reinterpretation of the puzzle is why banks did not bid up the market prices of the eligible bonds to reflect their value in securing note issues. Copyright 1991 by Ohio State University Press.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (1991) Issue (Month): 3 (August) Pages: 293-307 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)