IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev13d/v1y2011ip13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jurisprudenta Curtii Europene a Drepturilor Omului in Materie de Imixtiune in infaptuirea Justitiei - The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Regarding Interference in Justice Administration (Romanian version)

Author

Listed:
  • Victor MORARU

    (Faculty of Law, “Stefan cel Mare” from Republic Moldova)

Abstract

The prohibition of any interference in the court’s work, but also the continuous promotion of legal interests is an important public value in any democratic society. However, in many cases these values are in conflict with other interests - both private and public. Regarding this problem in this study, we sought to answer the question: Is it possible to admit any interference in the work of justice administration, and if so, what are the acceptable limits for this interference? Due to the fact that in the national jurisdiction we cannot find a plausible answer to this question, our scientific approach aimed to study the European practice in matter of determining the acceptable limits of interference in the work of the judge. Therefore, our investigation is focused on the most relevant cases tangent with the question of allowable limits of interference in the work of the judge, namely: The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom and De Haes & Gijsels v. Belgium.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor MORARU, 2011. "Jurisprudenta Curtii Europene a Drepturilor Omului in Materie de Imixtiune in infaptuirea Justitiei - The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Regarding Interference in Justice Administ," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Drept/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Law, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1, pages 13-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:1:y:2011:i::p:13-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    court; legal interest; justice; interference; jugde; case;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev13d:v:1:y:2011:i::p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.