IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev10b/v1y2010ip113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representative Idea as Divine Gift. A Theological Ambiguity of Malebranche’s Theory of Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Ph.D. Cristian MOISUC

    (Scientific Researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy and Social and Political Sciences, University Al. I. Cuza – Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

In Descartes's posterity, his followers have claimed each one that his interpretation of the status of idea (an inherent modality – Arnauld, or an external reality of cogito – Malebranche) is the most “proper”. Malebranche’s theory of the vision of ideas in Good seems to be an ingenious but not less problematic effort to address the uncertainties in the Second Cartesian Meditation. This solution, however, requires the reinterpretation of the Cartesian concept of "clarity". In order to be “clear”, an idea should be “close”, as close as possible to the soul. The idea should even “touch” the soul. How the “remote” idea does “approach” and “touch” the soul? How is possible to think the original “remoteness” of the idea? We intend to emphasize and to analyze some theological presuppositions that make the Malebranche’s theory of knowledge ambiguous.

Suggested Citation

  • Ph.D. Cristian MOISUC, 2011. "Representative Idea as Divine Gift. A Theological Ambiguity of Malebranche’s Theory of Knowledge," Conferinta Stiintifica Internationala Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Lumen International Scientific Conference Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1, pages 113-113, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev10b:v:1:y:2010:i::p:113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro/conferintalumen2011/?p=193
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cogito; the transcendental distance; representation; remoteness; divine Word;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev10b:v:1:y:2010:i::p:113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.