Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

La medición del bienestar social relacionado con la salud/The Measurement of the Health Related Social Welfare

Contents:

Author Info

  • ABELLÁN PERPIÑÁN, JOSÉ Mª

    ()
    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Murcia. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Campus de Espinardo. 30100 Murcia. Fax: 968 363745.Tfno.: 968363736)

  • SÁNCHEZ MARTÍNEZ,FERNANDO I.

    ()
    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Murcia. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Campus de Espinardo. 30100 Murcia. Fax: 968 363745.Tfno. 968363736)

  • MARTÍNEZ PÉREZ, JORGE E.

    ()
    (Tfno.:Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Murcia. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Campus de Espinardo. 30100 Murcia. Fax: 968 363745.Tfno.: 968367928)

Abstract

This paper systematizes the different approaches used to measure health related social preferences. We suggest that those preferences involving both personal and altruistic concerns (the so-called “socially inclusive personal preferences”) should be used to make social decisions. We argue that the best existing method for eliciting such preferences is the “veil of ignorance” approach. We report on the results of a pilot study in which we try different methods of eliciting preferences, each of them inducing different perspectives (personal, social and socially inclusive preferences). Preliminary results suggest that the “veil of ignorance” approach could be a useful method to elicit those “mixed” preferences that lay in-between personal and social (altruistic) preferences. En este artículo revisamos de forma sistemática los enfoques que se han utilizado para medir preferencias colectivas relacionadas con la salud. Sugerimos que las preferencias relacionadas con la salud que deberían medirse para tomar decisiones sociales son aquellas que combinan egoísmo y altruismo (“preferencias personales socialmente inclusivas”), y que el método más apropiado para medir tales preferencias es el ”velo de la ignorancia”. Presentamos un estudio piloto en el que se prueban distintos métodos para medir las preferencias que tratan de suscitar diferentes perspectivas en los sujetos (personal, social y personal socialmente inclusiva). Los resultados preliminares sugieren que el método del “velo de la ignorancia” puede ser útil para medir preferencias mixtas, situadas a mitad de camino entre las estrictamente personales y las puramente sociales o altruistas.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.revista-eea.net
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Volume (Year): 25 (2007)
Issue (Month): (Diciembre)
Pages: 823 - 24 Páginas

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:25_3_15

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN
Phone: (34) 983 423320
Fax: (34) 983 184568
Web page: http://www.revista-eea.net
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.revista-eea.net

Related research

Keywords: Quality-adjusted life-years; Social welfare function; Veil of ignorance; Socially inclusive personal preferences/Años de Vida Ajustados por la Calidad; Función de bienestar social; Velo de la ignorancia; Preferencias personales socialmente inclusivas.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Bleichrodt, Han & Doctor, Jason & Stolk, Elly, 2005. "A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 655-678, July.
  2. Wagstaff, Adam, 1991. "QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 21-41, May.
  3. Magnus Johannesson, 2001. "Should we aggregate relative or absolute changes in QALYs?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(7), pages 573-577.
  4. Dolan, Paul & Cookson, Richard, 2000. "A qualitative study of the extent to which health gain matters when choosing between groups of patients," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 19-30, February.
  5. Fredrik Andersson & Carl Hampus Lyttkens, 1999. "Preferences for equity in health behind a veil of ignorance," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(5), pages 369-378.
  6. Dolan, Paul, 1998. "The measurement of individual utility and social welfare," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 39-52, January.
  7. Parkin, D. & Devlin, N., 2004. "Is there a case for using Visual Analogue Scale valuations in Cost-Utility Analysis?," Working Papers 04/03, Department of Economics, City University London.
  8. José-Luis Pinto-Prades & José-María Abellán-Perpiñán, 2004. "Mesuring the Health of Populations: The Veil of Ignorance Approach," Working Papers 116, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  9. Cookson, Richard & Dolan, Paul, 1999. "Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 63-74, September.
  10. Olsen, Jan Abel, 2000. "A note on eliciting distributive preferences for health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 541-550, July.
  11. Paul Dolan & Aki Tsuchiya, 2011. "Determining the parameters in a social welfare function using stated preference data: an application to health," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(18), pages 2241-2250.
  12. John C. Harsanyi, 1955. "Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63, pages 309.
  13. Joshua A. Salomon & Christopher J.L. Murray, 2004. "A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 281-290.
  14. Johannesson, Magnus & Gerdtham, Ulf-G, 1996. "A note on the estimation of the equity-efficiency trade-off for QALYs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 359-368, June.
  15. Eva Rodr�guez-M�guez & José-Luis Pinto-Prades, 2002. "Measuring the social importance of concentration or dispersion of individual health benefits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 43-53.
  16. Rebecca L. Walker & Andrew W. Siegel, 2002. "Morality and the limits of societal values in health care allocation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(3), pages 265-273.
  17. Paul Dolan & Aki Tsuchiya, 2003. "The person trade-off method and the transitivity principle: an example from preferences over age weighting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(6), pages 505-510.
  18. Paul Anand, 2005. "QALYs and capabilities: a comment on Cookson," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(12), pages 1283-1286.
  19. Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpi�an & Jose-Luis Pinto-Prades, 1999. "Health state after treatment: a reason for discrimination?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(8), pages 701-707.
  20. Paul Dolan & Jan Abel Olsen & Paul Menzel & Jeff Richardson, 2003. "An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(7), pages 545-551.
  21. Xavier Cuadras-Morató & José-Luis Pinto-Prades & José-Mar�a Abellán-Perpi�án, 2001. "Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claims," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 187-205.
  22. Richard Cookson, 2005. "QALYs and the capability approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(8), pages 817-829.
  23. Mooney, Gavin, 1998. ""Communitarian claims" as an ethical basis for allocating health care resources," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1171-1180, November.
  24. Bleichrodt, Han, 1997. "Health utility indices and equity considerations," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 65-91, February.
  25. Erik Nord & Jose Luis Pinto & Jeff Richardson & Paul Menzel & Peter Ubel, 1999. "Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 25-39.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:25_3_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.