Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Mercados de creencias versus hipótesis de la secularización: aspectos positivos y normativos/Markets of beliefs vs. scularization hupothecis: positive and normative aspects

Contents:

Author Info

  • PENA LÓPEZ, J.A.

    ()
    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada I. Universidad de La Coruña.)

  • SANCHEZ SANTOS, J.M.

    ()
    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada I. Universidad de La Coruña.)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    En el presente trabajo se aborda la dimensión objetiva del hecho religioso con la metodología propia del análisis económico, poniendo en cuestión las derivaciones de la tradicional hipótesis de la secularización, asumida acríticamente por las restantes ciencias sociales. Así, frente a una visión de la Religión como un hecho social en declive, se adopta un enfoque de oferta que explica su evolución con categorías de mercado. A partir de datos observados sobre el comportamiento de la demanda y basándonos en la interrelación entre competencia inter e intraconfesional, defendemos que los niveles de práctica religiosa serían explicables por las peculiaridades regulatorias de cada mercado de creencias. Estos resultados refuerzan la solidez de la tesis smithiana ya puesta de relieve por L. Iannaccone. La evidencia empírica obtenida justifica una propuesta normativa sobre la necesaria neutralidad de las políticas públicas al respecto. In the present work, the objective dimension of religious facts is analysed with the methodology of Economic Analysis. We put to the test the derivations of the traditional hypothesis of the secularization, assumed acritically in most of social sciences. Opposite to that vision of Religion as a social fact in declivity, a supply approach that explains its evolution with categories of market is adopted. Considering the data of demand of religion and the relationship between inter and intraconfessional competition, we show that the levels of religious practice could be explained by the regulatory peculiarities of each market of beliefs. These results reinforce the robustness of the smithian thesis about the religious markets, that L. Iannaccone had emphasized. The empirical evidence justifies a normative proposal on the necessary neutrality of public policies.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.revista-eea.net
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

    Volume (Year): 23 (2005)
    Issue (Month): (Diciembre)
    Pages: 837-861

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:23_3_14

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN
    Phone: (34) 983 423320
    Fax: (34) 983 184568
    Web page: http://www.revista-eea.net
    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information:
    Email:
    Web: http://www.revista-eea.net

    Related research

    Keywords: Economía de la Religión; Hipótesis de la secularización; Mercados de creencias; Test de Iannaccone/Economics of Religion; Secularization Hypothesis; Market of Beliefs; Iannaccone’s test.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Posner, Richard A, 1987. "The Law and Economics Movement," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 77(2), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Garza, Pablo Brañas & Neuman, Shoshana, 2003. "Analyzing Religiosity Within an Economic Framework: The Case of Spanish Catholics," IZA Discussion Papers 868, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    3. Charles M. North & Carl R. Gwin, 2004. "Religious Freedom and the Unintended Consequences of State Religion," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, Southern Economic Association, vol. 71(1), pages 103-117, July.
    4. Coase, R H, 1974. "The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 384-91, May.
    5. Azzi, Corry & Ehrenberg, Ronald G, 1975. "Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(1), pages 27-56, February.
    6. Peltzman, Sam, 1973. "The Effect of Government Subsidies-in-Kind on Private Expenditures: The Case of Higher Education," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(1), pages 1-27, Jan.-Feb..
    7. Iannaccone, Laurence R & Finke, Roger & Stark, Rodney, 1997. "Deregulating Religion: The Economics of Church and State," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(2), pages 350-64, April.
    8. Laurence R. Iannaccone, 1998. "Introduction to the Economics of Religion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1465-1495, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:23_3_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.