Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Mitos y falacias populares en el debate acerca de los sistemas de pensiones/Myths and Fallacies in the Debate About the Future of Pension Systems

Contents:

Author Info

  • ESTEVE MORA, F.

    ()
    (Departamento de Análisis Económico: Teoría Económica e Historia Económica. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Tfno:91 4974280.)

  • MUÑOZ DE BUSTILLO LLORENTE, R.

    ()
    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada. Universidad de Salamanca.Tfno: 92 3294500 ext.3125)

Abstract

El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo estudiar los retos a los que se enfrentan los sistemas de pensiones de reparto, derivados del proceso de envejecimiento demográfico experimentado en los países de renta alta. Para ello en una primera parte se analiza la naturaleza del problema y sus implicaciones para los sistemas de reparto y capitalización. Con posterioridad se revisa la interpretación dominante del mismo. Por último, se examinan desde una óptima crítica los supuestos tradicionales que se utilizan para concluir la quiebra financiera de los sistemas de reparto como consecuencia del envejecimiento demográfico así como algunas de las propuestas de reforma basadas en esta interpretación, cuestionando su relevancia frente al problema de envejecimiento demográfico que pretenden combatir. This paper deals with the challenges faced by the pay as you go pension systems due to the aging process of the population experienced in high income countries. In order to do so, the first part of the paper studies the nature of the problem, and its implications for the different types of pension systems (PAYG and capitalization). Then, the mainstream interpretation of the problem is reviewed. Last, the paper offers a critical analysis of the basic assumptions underlying many of the proposals of reform of the dominant PAYG pension systems, questioning its relevance to overcome the problem of population aging, supposedly its main goal.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.revista-eea.net
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Volume (Year): 22 (2004)
Issue (Month): (Agosto)
Pages: 289-316

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:22_2_9

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN
Phone: (34) 983 423320
Fax: (34) 983 184568
Web page: http://www.revista-eea.net
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.revista-eea.net

Related research

Keywords: Pensiones; productividad; bienestar; envejecimiento demográfico; Bienes públicos;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Woodward, Richard T. & Wui, Yong-Suhk, 2001. "The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 257-270, May.
  2. Richard T. Carson & Nicholas E. Flores & Kerry M. Martin & Jennifer L. Wright, 1996. "Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 72(1), pages 80-99.
  3. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
  4. Espey, Molly & Thilmany, Dawn D., 2000. "Farm Labor Demand: A Meta-Regression Analysis Of Wage Elasticities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(01), July.
  5. Chris Doucouliagos, 1995. "Worker participation and productivity in labor-managed and participatory capitalist firms: A meta-analysis," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 49(1), pages 58-77, October.
  6. Abay Mulatu & Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Cees A.A.M. Withagen, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 01-039/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  7. James M. Dean, 1980. "Benefit Incidence Methodology for Mixed Goods," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 69-96, January.
  8. Tim Jeppesen & John A. List & Henk Folmer, 2002. "Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 19-49.
  9. Rachel Croson & Melanie Marks, 2000. "Step Returns in Threshold Public Goods: A Meta- and Experimental Analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 239-259, March.
  10. Meerman, Jacob P, 1974. "The Definition of Income in Studies of Budget Incidence and Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 20(4), pages 515-22, December.
  11. Kraus, Margit & Hölsch, Katja, 2002. "European schemes of social assistance: an empirical analysis of set-ups and distributive impacts," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-51, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
  12. Card, David & Krueger, Alan B, 1995. "Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 238-43, May.
  13. Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Henri L.F. de Groot & Ruud A. de Mooij, 2002. "Meta-analysis: A Tool for Upgrading Inputs of Macroeconomic Policy Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-041/3, Tinbergen Institute.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:22_2_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.